Claims

TEDDICS shows strict measurement invariance across gender and main subject groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Measurement invariance across gender and main subject groups reached the strict level, permitting factor mean comparisons. → Siddiq F. 2015

Evidence

Siddiq F. 2015

Siddiq F., Scherer R. & Tondeur J. (2015). Teachers’ Emphasis on Developing Students’ Digital Information and Communication Skills (TEDDICS): A New Construct in 21st Century Education. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Multi-group ESEM invariance testing (Table 5) with changes in CFI, TLI, and RMSEA below the suggested cut-offs for configural through strict models across both gender and main-subject groupings.

"Tests of measurement invariance on gender and main subjects supported strict invariance, meeting the premise for making comparisons across groups (Millsap, 2011)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teddics-strict-invariance-gender-subject
title TEDDICS shows strict measurement invariance across gender and main subject groups
description TEDDICS shows strict measurement invariance across gender and main subject groups
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — siddiq-f-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.