Claims

Instruction through Telegram groups produces significantly higher intermediate EFL reading comprehension post-test scores than traditional classroom instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 Intermediate university EFL students taught reading comprehension through Telegram groups scored significantly higher than control students taught the same passages in class, with a printed effect size of .34. → Naderi 2018

Evidence

Naderi 2018

Naderi, S., & Akrami, A. (2018). EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension Development through MALL: Telegram Groups in Focus. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11223a

q2 · i1 · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of 55 experimental and 48 control intermediate university students; post-test distributions were non-normal so a Mann-Whitney U test was run. The article reports "significant difference" and states "The effect size was .34", described as a moderate association.

"there was significant difference [U=791.500, Z= -3.509, p=.000(two-tailed)] between the mean scores of the experimental and control groups' reading comprehension ability at the post-test scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.