Treatment students significantly outperformed comparison students on TEMI-O Mathematics Computation (g* = .44), with a marginal, non-significant-after-adjustment effect on SAT-10 Mathematics Procedures (g* = .23)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 On distal whole-number computation measures, the treatment group significantly outperformed the comparison group on TEMI-O Mathematics Computation (p = .001; g* = .44); the SAT-10 Mathematics Procedures difference (p = .05; g* = .23) was not statistically significant after Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment. → Bryant 2011
Evidence¶
Bryant 2011¶
Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Pfannenstiel, K. H., Porterfield, J., & Gersten, R. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78(1), 7-23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED577119
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
ANCOVA of distal outcome measures in the same randomized design (139 treatment, 65 comparison). The article reports TEMI-O Computation as significant with printed effect size g* = .44, and SAT-10 Mathematics Procedures as p = .05 with g* = .23 but not significant after Type I error adjustment.
"there were statistically significant differences on TEMI-O Computation {p = .001; g* = .44) and on SAT-10 Mathematics Procedures {p = .05; g* = .23), though this latter difference was not statistically significant after Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The intervention produced no significant group differences on distal problem-solving measures, as the authors predicted because problem solving was not directly taught — related
- First-graders with mathematics difficulties receiving the Tier 2 early numeracy intervention outperformed comparison students on the aligned TEMI-PM Total Score progress-monitoring measure (g* = .50) — related
- The intervention produced significant effects on the Addition/Subtraction Combinations, Place Value, and Number Sequences subtests but not on Magnitude Comparisons — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.