Claims

Preservice teachers completing 10 hours of metalinguistic coursework outperformed preservice teachers without such content in phoneme and morpheme identification

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After 10 hours of metalinguistic coursework, preservice teachers scored higher on phoneme identification (78.8%) and morpheme identification (72.9%) than preservice teachers who had not received metalinguistic content (49.7% and 64.5%). → McNeill 2018

Evidence

McNeill 2018

McNeill, B. C. (2018). Improving Preservice Teachers' Phonemic Awareness, Morphological Awareness and Orthographic Knowledge. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1). http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol43/iss1/2

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-course group comparison (Table 1) of 86 experimental preservice teachers against 36 comparison preservice teachers from Carreker et al. (2010), using percent-correct scores on the phoneme and morpheme identification tasks. The experimental cohort scored "78.8%" on phoneme identification versus 49.7%, and 72.9% versus 64.5% on morpheme identification.

"The comparison showed that the experimental cohort out-performed the comparison preservice group in phonemic awareness and morphological awareness knowledge."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.