Claims

Vocabulary learning gains in Term 2 of the extensive reading program were consistent with those from Term 1

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The learning gains in Term 2 were consistent with those from Term 1, replicating the group-level gain pattern across a second set of graded readers and target words. → Stuart Webb and Anna C.-S. Chang 2015

Evidence

Stuart Webb and Anna C.-S. Chang 2015

Stuart Webb and Anna C.-S. Chang. (2015). HOW DOES PRIOR WORD KNOWLEDGE AFFECT VOCABULARY LEARNING PROGRESS IN AN EXTENSIVE READING PROGRAM? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp. 651-675. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000606

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Second term of the same 37-week extensive reading program, using a second set of 100 target words from the 10 Level 2 graded readers; the article states "The learning gains in Term 2 were consistent with those from Term 1."

"The learning gains in Term 2 were consistent with those from Term 1."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id term2-gains-consistent-with-term1
title Vocabulary learning gains in Term 2 of the extensive reading program were consistent with those from Term 1
description Vocabulary learning gains in Term 2 of the extensive reading program were consistent with those from Term 1
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — stuart-webb-and-anna-c-s-chang-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.