Vocabulary learning gains in Term 2 of the extensive reading program were consistent with those from Term 1¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The learning gains in Term 2 were consistent with those from Term 1, replicating the group-level gain pattern across a second set of graded readers and target words. → Stuart Webb and Anna C.-S. Chang 2015
Evidence¶
Stuart Webb and Anna C.-S. Chang 2015¶
Stuart Webb and Anna C.-S. Chang. (2015). HOW DOES PRIOR WORD KNOWLEDGE AFFECT VOCABULARY LEARNING PROGRESS IN AN EXTENSIVE READING PROGRAM? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp. 651-675. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000606
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Second term of the same 37-week extensive reading program, using a second set of 100 target words from the 10 Level 2 graded readers; the article states "The learning gains in Term 2 were consistent with those from Term 1."
"The learning gains in Term 2 were consistent with those from Term 1."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Reading and Language — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Extensive reading of graded readers produced substantial vocabulary learning gains for EFL learners across proficiency levels — related
- Prior vocabulary knowledge moderates vocabulary learning gains in an extensive reading program, with high-level learners gaining more than intermediate and low-level learners — related
- Available second language research indicates extensive reading programs are generally more effective than systematic vocabulary instruction using decontextualized exercises — related
- Vocabulary knowledge gained through extensive reading showed little decay on a three-month delayed posttest, with relative gains ranging from 21.05% (low-level) to 59.01% (high-level) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
term2-gains-consistent-with-term1 |
title |
Vocabulary learning gains in Term 2 of the extensive reading program were consistent with those from Term 1 |
description |
Vocabulary learning gains in Term 2 of the extensive reading program were consistent with those from Term 1 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stuart-webb-and-anna-c-s-chang-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.