The testing effect has been demonstrated across a variety of mostly low-element-interactivity materials, but problem-solving tasks had received very little testing-effect research attention¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The testing effect (testing beats restudy for long-term retention) has been shown with word lists, facts, prose, symbol-word pairs, lectures, maps, functions, and animations; problem-solving tasks were little studied. → Tamara van Gog & Liesbeth Kester & Kim Dirkx & Vincent Hoogerheide & Joris Boerboom & Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen 2015
Evidence¶
Tamara van Gog & Liesbeth Kester & Kim Dirkx & Vincent Hoogerheide & Joris Boerboom & Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen 2015¶
Tamara van Gog & Liesbeth Kester & Kim Dirkx & Vincent Hoogerheide & Joris Boerboom & Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen. (2015). Testing After Worked Example Study Does Not Enhance Delayed Problem-Solving Performance Compared to Restudy. Educ Psychol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9297-3
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Background synthesis in the article's introduction, citing prior reviews and studies (e.g., Roediger and Karpicke 2006a) showing the testing effect across varied materials; the article notes problem-solving tasks "have received very little attention in research on the testing effect". This is second-hand attribution, not a new empirical result of this study.
"The testing effect refers to the finding that after an initial study opportunity, testing is more effective for long-term retention than not testing and even than restudying (for a review, see Roediger and Karpicke 2006a)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Retrieval practice improves long-term retention — a broader claim this one bears on
- No testing effect was found for acquiring problem-solving skills through worked example study across eight experiments — related
- Retrieval practice enhances performance on final inference and transfer questions relative to restudying, although a single-word fill-in-the-blank task did not — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
testing-effect-established-verbal-materials-not-problem-solving |
title |
The testing effect has been demonstrated across a variety of mostly low-element-interactivity materials, but problem-solving tasks had received very little testing-effect research attention |
description |
The testing effect has been demonstrated across a variety of mostly low-element-interactivity materials, but problem-solving tasks had received very little testing-effect research attention |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tamara-van-gog-liesbeth-kester-kim-dirkx-vincent-hoogerheide-joris-boerboom-peter-p-j-l-verkoeijen-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.