Text difficulty moderates the effect of explaining modality: oral explaining outperforms written explaining on inference-based questions only for the high-difficult text¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? For the high-difficult text, students who explained orally outperformed students who explained in written form on inference-based questions (d = 0.32). → Jacob 2019
q3 i? The learning activity × text difficulty interaction on inference-based questions was significant, F(2, 111) = 4.67, p = .011, η²p = .023. → Jacob 2019
Evidence¶
Jacob 2019¶
Jacob, L., Lachner, A., & Scheiter, K. (2019). Learning by Explaining Orally or In Written Form? Text Difficulty Matters. https://aspredicted.org/sv3zv.pdf
q3 · i? · causal · r3
Mixed factorial ANCOVA on inference-based questions with learning activity as between-students factor and text difficulty as within-students factor, controlling for prior knowledge. The article reports "a significant interaction between learning activity and text difficulty"; planned contrasts showed oral explaining outperformed written explaining, t(111) = 1.81, p = .037, d = 0.32.
"However, in line with our hypothesis, we found a significant interaction between learning activity and text difficulty, F(2, 111) = 4.67, p = .011, η²p = .023."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Inferencing — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Generating explanations (oral or written) outperforms retrieval practice on inference-based questions for the high-difficult text — related
- For the low-difficult text, oral explaining, written explaining, and retrieval practice yield comparable learning outcomes — related
- The modality effect on inference-based questions is serially mediated by personal references and comprehensiveness of explanations — related
- Oral explanations contain more personal references and more concepts than written explanations, but not more elaborations — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
text-difficulty-moderates-explaining-modality-effect |
title |
Text difficulty moderates the effect of explaining modality: oral explaining outperforms written explaining on inference-based questions only for the high-difficult text |
description |
Text difficulty moderates the effect of explaining modality: oral explaining outperforms written explaining on inference-based questions only for the high-difficult text |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jacob-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.