Claims

Within-group pre-to-post TFCS changes were not statistically significant in either group, though the experimental group's views developed positively and the control group's negatively

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Paired TFCS pre-post tests were non-significant in both groups (experimental t(19)=-0.832, p>.05; control t(17)=0.182, p>.05), while experimental means rose (95.95 to 99.15) and control means fell (87.39 to 86.44). → Buber 2017

Evidence

Buber 2017

Buber, A., & Coban Unal, G. (2017). The effects of learning activities based on argumentation on conceptual understanding of 7th graders about “force and motion” unit and establishing thinking friendly classroom environment. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.367

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired samples t-tests on TFCS within each group of the quasi-experiment. The article reports that although not significant, posttest scores of the experimental group increased compared to pretest while control group posttest results were less than pretest.

"In TFCS results, there isn’t significant difference between pre and posttests of experiment group (t(19)= -0.832, p>.05). There isn’t significant difference between pre and posttests of control group, either (t(17)=0.182, p>.05)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.