Whether conceptual discrepancies are noticed (or not) and how they are resolved can be traced through concurrent think-aloud protocols and retrospective interviews¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Study 2 used concurrent think-aloud protocols and retrospective interviews to explore why discrepancies were noticed or not noticed and how they were resolved. → study2-method

Evidence¶

study2-method¶

Gregory Trevors, Reza Feyzi-Behnagh, Roger Azevedo, François Bouchet. Self-Regulated Learning Processes Vary as a Function of Epistemic Beliefs and Contexts: Mixed Method Evidence from Eye Tracking and Concurrent and Retrospective Reports. Learning and Instruction, 2016, 42, pp.31-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.11.003

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

Study 2, part of the multi-study mixed method design, collected "concurrent think-aloud protocols and retrospective interviews" from 20 university students learning science content with conceptual discrepancies, extending Study 1's behavioral measures with explanations of discrepancy detection and resolution.

"In Study 2 (n = 20), we collected concurrent think-aloud protocols and retrospective interviews to further explore why discrepancies were noticed (or not) and how they were resolved."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Prior knowledge and epistemic self-efficacy as an evaluator of knowledge are important themes in detecting and efficiently resolving conceptual discrepancies — related
• University students adapt their behavioral processing of discrepant science content as a function of their epistemic cognition and discrepancy type — related
• Learners resolve grammar-related noticing with intuition, reasoning, rephrasing and explicit rules rather than external resources — related
• Lexical LREs dominate grammar-related LREs in young learners' L2 writing noticing — related
• After high-confidence errors, resolving the discrepancy with additional information produced enjoyment, while failure to resolve it produced frustration — related