Think-aloud protocols reveal that self-regulated reading is dynamic across time, responsive to context, and varies by reading purpose¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Self-regulated reading processes change across time, environments, and purposes, as revealed by comparing think-aloud reports. → Hu 2017

Evidence¶

Hu 2017¶

Hu, Jingjing; Gao, Xuesong (Andy). (2017). Using think-aloud protocol in self-regulated reading research. Educational Research Review, v.22, pp. 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.004

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's synthesis of think-aloud studies (e.g., Bråten & Strømsø 2003; Coiro & Dobler 2007; Linderholm & van den Broek 2002) concludes that self-regulated reading is "dyamic across time, responsive to contextual conditions and varies according to reading purposes."

"These studies through the use of think aloud protocols reveal that self-regulated reading process is dyamic across time, responsive to contextual conditions and varies according to reading purposes."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Think-aloud reports are incomplete and sometimes nonveridical, particularly for metacognitive processes — related
• Learning and teaching processes in networked learning are not static but have different dynamics at various stages of collaborative work — related