The reviewed competency assessments can be classified into three categories: broad assessments, narrow assessments, and unclear or unspecified assessments.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The review classified the various assessment metrics into three categories: (1) broad assessments, (2) narrow assessments, and (3) unclear or unspecified assessments. → Hazelwood R. Jordan 2025
Evidence¶
Hazelwood R. Jordan 2025¶
Hazelwood R. Jordan, Robinson Garnet F., Wolford George W., Smith Rebecca F. (2025). Assessment of Dysphagia Management Competence among Healthcare Providers: A Scoping Review. Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10835-1
q2 · i? · review · r2
In the Discussion, the review states that "These measures can generally be classified into three categories: (1) broad assessments, which include self-reports or knowledge tests, (2) narrow assessments, which focus on particular assessment components or competencies, such as FEES, without evaluating the entire program, and (3) unclear or unspecified assessments."
"These measures can generally be classified into three categories: (1) broad assessments, which include self-reports or knowledge tests [19, 37, 42, 52, 54, 55, 57], (2) narrow assessments, which focus on particular assessment components or competencies, such as FEES, without evaluating the entire program [53, 54, 56, 58], and (3) unclear or unspecified assessments [32]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- No specific standardized protocol currently exists for the assessment of dysphagia competence across healthcare disciplines. — related
- Measuring SEL involves a tradeoff between measuring narrower discrete skills and measuring broader competencies — related
- A prominent trend was the reliance on competency metrics that involved expert observation of specific clinical skills, with a notable absence of comprehensive measures combining broad scope and operationally defined skill sets. — related
- Evaluations of IPP experiential learning spanned student learning outcomes, initiative evaluations, and other outcomes such as client satisfaction — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.