Three factors influenced adoption of the SST agenda tool: lack of guided practice, inconsistent routines, and value not visible to teachers¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The case study identifies three key factors influencing adoption: lack of guided practice/preparation, inconsistent routines and existing habits, and the tool's value not being immediately visible to SST members. → Cocuzza 2026

Evidence¶

Cocuzza 2026¶

Cocuzza, B., Noakes, S., Aso, C., Goldschmidt, L., and Bennett, K. (2026). Designing student success systems intentionally: How Warwick Public Schools and Panorama bridge the gap with co-designed technical solutions. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/303

q2 · i? · design · r2

Case-study analysis in Table 1, "Key Factors Influencing Adoption." The three factors are lack of guided practice/preparation, inconsistent routines and existing habits minimizing tool use, and value of the solution not immediately visible to SST members, which disincentivized use.

"There were three key factors that influenced adoption:"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The co-designed AI-enabled SST meeting agenda tool saw mixed district-wide adoption despite enthusiasm in facilitated meetings — related
• A teacher-initiated report card comment generator built in Solara saw immediate high adoption without formal rollout or training — related
• Teachers' digital competence is a critical factor influencing both AI tool adoption and its pedagogical effectiveness — related
• Perceived enjoyment of GenAI tools is positively associated with in-service teachers' attitudes, perceived ease of use and behavioural intention in a Dominican Republic survey — related