Claims

A qualitative study of 30 university teachers reported three design practices that are incremental and iterative

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Bennett et al.'s extensive qualitative study with 30 interviewees identified three design practices of university faculty that are incremental and iterative. → Dabae Lee 2021

Evidence

Dabae Lee 2021

Dabae Lee. (2021). The process of designing for [online] learning: response to Bennett et al.. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09915-w

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

This response article reports, citing Bennett et al. (2017), a qualitative interview study addressing "the knowledge gap of design practices of university faculty" with 30 interviewees, yielding three design practices characterized as incremental and iterative. No effect sizes are printed.

"It addressed the knowledge gap of design practices of university faculty by conducting an extensive qualitative study with 30 interviewees. Three design practices reported that are incremental and iterative."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.