By the end of first grade, 45% of treatment students versus 22% of comparison students were no longer at risk for mathematics difficulties on the spring TEMI-PM¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? A larger percentage of treatment students than comparison students moved out of the risk category by end of first grade (45% vs. 22%), based on spring TEMI-PM results; no effect size or inferential test is printed for this contrast. → Bryant 2011

Evidence¶

Bryant 2011¶

Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Pfannenstiel, K. H., Porterfield, J., & Gersten, R. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78(1), 7-23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED577119

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Clinical-effects analysis of the randomized study, defined by the authors as the percentage of students who moved out of the risk category based on end-of-year scores. The article prints 45% for treatment and 22% for comparison; no inferential test or effect size is reported.

"By the end of first grade, 45% of treatment students and 22% of comparison students were no longer at risk for .mathematics difficulties, as determined by the results on the spring TEMI-PM."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• First-graders with mathematics difficulties receiving the Tier 2 early numeracy intervention outperformed comparison students on the aligned TEMI-PM Total Score progress-monitoring measure (g* = .50) — related
• Transition out of the high-risk category (below the 10th TEMA percentile) did not differ significantly between ROOTS and control students — related