Many educators misunderstood the performance measures and the pay-for-performance bonuses under TIF¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Many educators misunderstood the performance measures and the pay-for-performance bonuses. → Jeffrey Max 2014

Evidence¶

Jeffrey Max 2014¶

Jeffrey Max, Jill Constantine, Alison Wellington, Kristin Hallgren, Steven Glazerman, Hanley Chiang, Cecilia Speroni. (2014). Pay for Performance: Evaluating the Teacher Incentive Fund (In Focus Brief). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/pay-for-performance-evaluating-the-teacher-incentive-fund

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Key finding from the TIF evaluation brief concerning educator understanding of the program's performance measures and bonus structure. The brief reports that "many educators misunderstood" these measures and bonuses; no effect size is printed.

"Many educators misunderstood the performance measures and the pay-for-performance bonuses."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Many teachers misunderstood whether they were eligible for performance bonuses or the amount they could earn — related
• The TIF evaluation is designed to estimate impacts of performance pay on student achievement and on educators' attitudes, awareness, mobility, and recruitment — related
• In the 10 evaluation districts, educators did not always understand the performance measures and pay-for-performance bonuses used for TIF — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• More than half of teachers in the evaluation districts did not know they were eligible for pay-for-performance bonuses — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Teachers in the evaluation districts underestimated the size of pay-for-performance bonuses they could earn through TIF — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Educators' understanding of the TIF program improved in year two, but more than one-third of teachers still did not know they were eligible for a bonus and underestimated bonus size — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Some aspects of TIF implementation improved between years one and two while others, including bonus awareness, remained challenging — related