Before the activity program, experimental and control groups showed no significant difference in Pictorial Form pretest scores¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Pretest Pictorial Form score averages did not differ significantly between the experimental group (X=37.06) and the control group (X=38.25) [U=12.5, p>086]. → Birgül et al. 2017

Evidence¶

Birgül et al. 2017¶

Arzu Ergişi Birgül, Elvan Şahin Zeteroglu, Meral Taner Derman. (2017). The Effect of the Activities Enhanced Concerning Time Concept on Time Concept Acquisition of Children. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(12A): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051302

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Mann Whitney U Test on pretest Pictorial Form scores of 13 experimental and 16 control children; the article prints pretest means of X=37.06 and X=38.25 and reports "not a significant difference". Equivalence was not tested; no effect size is printed.

"It is concluded that there was not a significant difference between the score averages of the experimental and the control group [U=12.5, p>086]."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A 10-week enriched time-concept activity program produced a statistically significant posttest difference on the Pictorial Form between experimental and control preschool children — related