Claims

Time-on-task during practice was significantly higher for correct and erroneous examples than for contrasting examples and practice problems

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Time-on-task differed across conditions (erroneous examples = correct examples > contrasting examples = practice problems). → Lara M. van Peppen 2021

Evidence

Lara M. van Peppen 2021

Lara M. van Peppen, Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen, Anita E. G. Heijltjes, Eva M. Janssen, Tamara van Gog. (2021). Enhancing students' critical thinking skills: is comparing correct and erroneous examples beneficial? Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09559-0

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Brown–Forsythe one-way ANOVA on logged practice time (after a significant Levene's test) printed the quoted result; pairwise comparisons showed erroneous (M = 862.79) and correct examples (M = 839.58) exceeded contrasting (M = 512.29) and practice problems (M = 500.41), all p's < .001.

"This analysis revealed a significant time-on-task (in seconds) difference between the conditions during practice, F(3, 120.28) = 16.19, p < .001, η2 = .22"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id time-on-task-example-conditions-higher
title Time-on-task during practice was significantly higher for correct and erroneous examples than for contrasting examples and practice problems
description Time-on-task during practice was significantly higher for correct and erroneous examples than for contrasting examples and practice problems
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lara-m-van-peppen-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.