Allowing ACT-R memory parameters to vary with the between-session interval produces a strong fit between model and recall data across timescales¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Dividing learning sequences into interval bins and fitting model parameters separately per bin yields a strong correspondence between data and model, whichever parameter is varied. → Maarten van der Velde 2026
Evidence¶
Maarten van der Velde 2026¶
Maarten van der Velde, Florian Sense, Jelmer P. Borst & Hedderik van Rijn. (2026). Explaining forgetting at different timescales requires a time-variant forgetting function. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00447-1
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Model-fitting analysis in which data were split into bins of equal width on a logarithmic scale by between-session interval, with parameters fitted per bin. The article reports that "this procedure produces a strong correspondence between data and model, irrespective of which parameter we vary." No effect size is printed.
"As Figs.1d, 1f, and1h show, this procedure produces a strong correspondence between data and model, irrespective of which parameter we vary."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In 5-fold cross-validation, multi-bin time-variant model fits outperform single-bin fits, with diminishing returns beyond a 5-bin split and further gains from differentiating by learner and amount of practice — related
- Optimal ACT-R parameter values change systematically and predictably with the length of the between-session interval — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Extrapolating from parameters fitted to a restricted range of between-session intervals produces worse predictions than time-variant fits — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A single time-invariant ACT-R forgetting function cannot simultaneously capture recall accuracy on short and long between-session intervals — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
time-variant-parameters-capture-retention-across-timescales |
title |
Allowing ACT-R memory parameters to vary with the between-session interval produces a strong fit between model and recall data across timescales |
description |
Allowing ACT-R memory parameters to vary with the between-session interval produces a strong fit between model and recall data across timescales |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — maarten-van-der-velde-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.