Claims

The possibilities of the electronic computer as an instructional tool had been almost completely ignored in Title VII research.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 1961 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? At the time of writing, the instructional possibilities of the electronic computer had as yet been almost completely ignored in the Title VII grant program. → William H. Allen 1961

Evidence

William H. Allen 1961

William H. Allen, Editor. (1961). The Meaning of Title VII. AVCR. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02713404

q1 · i? · theoretical · r1

Editorial judgment, offered as a third uncovered area beyond the two named gaps: the computer's instructional possibilities, in the editor's words, "have as yet been almost com- pletely ignored" by the program.

"Also worth considering is the fact that the possibilities of what may well be the most important instructional tool of all the electronic computer--have as yet been almost com- pletely ignored"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id titlevii-computer-instruction-ignored
title The possibilities of the electronic computer as an instructional tool had been almost completely ignored in Title VII research.
description The possibilities of the electronic computer as an instructional tool had been almost completely ignored in Title VII research.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1961
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — william-h-allen-1961

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.