Claims

Teachers, senior leaders, speech and language therapists and local authority managers perceived that Talk of the Town had a positive effect on pupil learning and confidence

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Process-evaluation interviews found stakeholders perceived positive effects on pupil learning and confidence. → Thurston 2016

Evidence

Thurston 2016

Thurston, A. (2016). Talk of the Town: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581531

q2 · i? · qualitative · r1

Process evaluation based on interviews with teachers, senior management teams, speech and language therapists and local authority managers. This is perception evidence, not an outcome measure; no effect size is printed.

"There was evidence that teachers, members of school senior management teams, speech and language therapists and local authority managers perceived that the Talk of the Town intervention had a positive effect on pupil learning and confidence."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.