Claims

Implementation of the TPI procedure reached only one tutor-trainee pair out of nine potential tutors, though participants assessed it positively

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the implementation case study with UNPA Master's Degree tutors using Mahara, out of 9 potential tutors only one tutor-trainee researcher pair could be formed, yet the two participants who put the procedure into practice assessed it highly positively. → Darder 2015 q2 i? The authors attribute participant loss to lack of motivation, skills and vision, or shortage of time and resources, noting change in the academic environment may be seen as additional and unnecessary work. → Darder 2015 (2)

Evidence

Darder 2015

Darder, A.; Pérez Garcias, A. (2015). Online tutoring procedure for research project supervision: management, organization and key elements. New Approaches in Educational Research 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2015.4.110

q2 · i? · design · r2

Implementation case study in which tutors and their students organized the virtual tutoring environment in Mahara; information was collected through an observation card and a questionnaire. The two implementers called it "an excellent piece of work which guides, clarifies, and specifies a suitable itinerary".

"It is worth highlighting that, out of 9 potential tutors, it was only possible to have a tutor-trainee researcher pair."

Darder 2015 (2)

Darder, A.; Pérez Garcias, A. (2015). Online tutoring procedure for research project supervision: management, organization and key elements. New Approaches in Educational Research 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2015.4.110

q2 · i? · design · r2

Authors' interpretation (type e) offered in the conclusions to explain low participation, hedged with "probably" and attributed partly to cited literature (Tejedor et al., 2009; Rodríguez, 2011). No data analysis supports it.

"probably the lack of the motivation, the skills and the vision required, or the shortage of time and resources (Tejedor, García -Valcárcel, & Prada, 2009) for the project resulted in the loss of participants"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tpi-implementation-low-participation-positive-assessment
title Implementation of the TPI procedure reached only one tutor-trainee pair out of nine potential tutors, though participants assessed it positively
description Implementation of the TPI procedure reached only one tutor-trainee pair out of nine potential tutors, though participants assessed it positively
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — darder-2015, darder-2015-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.