TPS students scored significantly higher than Non-TPS students on posttest CT subscale scores¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? All experimental-group students scored significantly higher than the control group on the five CT subscales at posttest (e.g., argument t=8.48, p<0.001; resolution t=3.86, p<0.001). → Mahmoud Kaddoura 2013
Evidence¶
Mahmoud Kaddoura 2013¶
Mahmoud Kaddoura. (2013). Think Pair Share: A teaching Learning Strategy to Enhance Students' Critical Thinking. Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 36.4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1061947
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Table 4 reports posttest subscale comparisons between the TPS and Non-TPS groups; the article states the experimental group "scored significantly higher than in the control group on the five CT subscales", with printed means such as argument 827.11 versus 753.04.
"All students from the experimental group scored significantly higher than in the control group on the five CT subscales as indicated in table 4."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Nursing students taught with Think-Pair-Show gained significantly more critical thinking over a 17-week course than students taught without it — related
- TPS and Non-TPS groups did not differ significantly on pretest CT scores but did differ significantly on posttest overall CT scores — related
- TPS students showed significantly larger pretest-to-posttest gains than Non-TPS students on all five CT subscales — related
- No significant pretest differences existed between TPS and Non-TPS groups on any of the five CT subscales — related
- Non-traditional teaching methods significantly improve critical thinking skills in nursing students compared to control groups — a broader claim this one bears on
- Cooperative learning with Think-Pair-Share and RoundTable was followed by larger critical thinking gains than traditional teaching in 4th graders, in a two-class quasi-experiment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.