Claims

Terminology test advantage of tracing and pointing is not robust to adjustment for prior knowledge

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 The tracing and pointing condition answered more terminology questions correctly (d = 0.39, one-tailed p = 0.041), but the difference was no longer statistically significant in an ANCOVA controlling self-reported prior knowledge (d = 0.30). → Yining Wang 2025 q3 i? After covariate adjustment the terminology difference was not statistically significant, so H4 was not supported. → Yining Wang 2025 (2)

Evidence

Yining Wang 2025

Yining Wang, Kexin Han, Paul Ginns. (2025). Tracing and Pointing Support Multimedia Learning: A Cross-Cultural Replication. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10005-7

q3 · i1 · causal · r2

In the same randomized experiment, the tracing and pointing condition scored higher on the 20-item terminology test, "d = 0.39 [95% CI 0.05, ∞]", one-tailed p = 0.041, before covariate adjustment.

"Participants in the tracing and pointing condition answered more terminology test questions correctly (M = 12.69, SD = 3.51) than those in the non-tracing and pointing condition (M = 11.38, SD = 3.30), t(82) = 1.76, p = 0.041 (one-tailed), d = 0.39 [95% CI 0.05, ∞]."

Yining Wang 2025 (2)

Yining Wang, Kexin Han, Paul Ginns. (2025). Tracing and Pointing Support Multimedia Learning: A Cross-Cultural Replication. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10005-7

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA using self-reported prior knowledge as covariate (correlated with terminology scores, r = 0.26, p = 0.019) eliminated the group difference: "F(1, 81) = 2.00, p = 0.162".

"Under this analysis, the difference between conditions was no longer statistically significant, F(1, 81) = 2.00, p = 0.162, d = 0.30 [95% CI −0.12, ∞]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tracing-pointing-terminology-not-robust-ancova
title Terminology test advantage of tracing and pointing is not robust to adjustment for prior knowledge
description Terminology test advantage of tracing and pointing is not robust to adjustment for prior knowledge
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — yining-wang-2025, yining-wang-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.