Trainee and trainer responses contradicted each other on ten questionnaire items (4, 10, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25), suggesting a lack of coordination among trainers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The analysis revealed a contradiction between trainees' and trainers' responses on Items 4, 10, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23 and 25. → Ali Al-Issa & Ali Al-Bulushi 2010
q2 i? The authors attribute the contradiction partly to the 39 per cent response rate and to respondents having been trained by only some trainers. → Ali Al-Issa & Ali Al-Bulushi 2010 (2)
Evidence¶
Ali Al-Issa & Ali Al-Bulushi 2010¶
Ali Al-Issa & Ali Al-Bulushi. (2010). Training English Language Student Teachers to Become Reflective Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, Vol 35, 4. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajtec/vol35/iss4/4/
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Conclusion section of the survey study. "a contradiction between the trainees’ responses on one hand and those of the trainers on the other" on ten named items; the authors link this to a lack of coordination among trainers in selecting and implementing reflection approaches.
"The analysis and discussion of the data have revealed that there is a contradiction between the trainees’ responses on one hand and those of the trainers on the other in relation to Items 4, 10, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23 and 25."
Ali Al-Issa & Ali Al-Bulushi 2010 (2)¶
Ali Al-Issa & Ali Al-Bulushi. (2010). Training English Language Student Teachers to Become Reflective Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, Vol 35, 4. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajtec/vol35/iss4/4/
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Authors' stated possible explanations in the Conclusion: "more than half of the trainees did not complete the questionnaire", and respondents were "taught and trained by certain trainers and not by others".
"One possible reason for this contradiction is that more than half of the trainees did not complete the questionnaire. Another could be that the trainees who did so were taught and trained by certain trainers and not by others."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Some SQU ELT trainers used prescriptive practices contrary to reflective preparation: telling trainees how to teach (74.2% agreement), restricting lesson planning to the teachers guide (53.4%), and training them to teach only the national textbook (66.8%)
- SQU ELT trainers encouraged peer observation and same-day feedback sessions, with 78.9% of trainees agreeing trainers encouraged class visits and 81.9% agreeing feedback came the same day as observation
- Gaps in reflective training: 42.9 per cent of trainees had not experienced on-line collaborative talk and 42 per cent had not been asked to produce written assignments about ELT in Oman — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
trainee-trainer-response-contradiction-ten-items |
title |
Trainee and trainer responses contradicted each other on ten questionnaire items (4, 10, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25), suggesting a lack of coordination among trainers |
description |
Trainee and trainer responses contradicted each other on ten questionnaire items (4, 10, 11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25), suggesting a lack of coordination among trainers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ali-al-issa-ali-al-bulushi-2010, ali-al-issa-ali-al-bulushi-2010-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.