Students rarely open transfer-practice cards immediately after solving; they want such problems organized into delayed, spaced wrong-book review instead¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 designr2–r3·q2
Currency · no dated study recorded · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Of 93 transfer-card exposures, students opened 8 cards (8.6%) and launched 4 practice questions (4.3%), a timing mismatch with homework completion goals. → transfer-funnel (2)
q2 i? Students selectively saved problems to history based on difficulty and wanted automated wrong-book organization for spaced weekend retrieval. → transfer-funnel (2)
Evidence¶
transfer-funnel¶
Harry Feng, Yuan Tian, and Erica Zhao. 2026. From Answer Generators to Reasoning Facilitators: Designing AI Tutors for Mathematical Reasoning in High-Stakes Environments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01692 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.01692
q2 · i? · design · r2
Telemetry transfer funnel from the field deployment. The article reports "93 transfer-card exposures" with 8 cards opened and 4 practice questions launched, interpreted as a timing mismatch rather than lack of perceived value.
"We observed 93 transfer-card exposures; students opened 8 cards (8.6% of exposures) and launched 4 practice questions (4.3% of exposures)."
transfer-funnel (2)¶
Harry Feng, Yuan Tian, and Erica Zhao. 2026. From Answer Generators to Reasoning Facilitators: Designing AI Tutors for Mathematical Reasoning in High-Stakes Environments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01692
q2 · i? · design · r3
Interview finding from the same field study: participants P09 and P10 wanted saved problems organized into a knowledge-map wrong-book for weekend spaced retrieval, which telemetry on selective saving corroborated.
"Students like KX (P09) and TYK (P10) still wanted AITutor to organize these problems into a knowledge-map "wrong-book" for delayed retrieval practice during weekend reviews."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learners Misjudge Spacing Benefits — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- System reliability and latency acted as a prerequisite bottleneck: 56.4% of started solves completed, with a 32.0-second average latency and 68.5-second p90 — related
- Learners misjudge which learning strategies are effective — related
- Timely feedback on homework increases learning, and computer platforms providing immediate feedback help teachers adapt — related
- Retrieval practice improves long-term retention — related
- Follow-up support shows low initiation but reliable completion: the bottleneck is noticing and composing the question, not the AI's ability to answer — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
transfer-practice-timing-mismatch-delayed-review |
title |
Students rarely open transfer-practice cards immediately after solving; they want such problems organized into delayed, spaced wrong-book review instead |
description |
Students rarely open transfer-practice cards immediately after solving; they want such problems organized into delayed, spaced wrong-book review instead |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — transfer-funnel, transfer-funnel-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.