Claims

The treatment did not level out inter-subject differences and made the treatment group more diverse in second conditional performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Standard deviations in both groups were higher on the posttests than on the pretest, and the treatment aggravated inter-subject variation. → Kruk 2012

Evidence

Kruk 2012

Mariusz Kruk. (2012). The Use of Internet Resources and Browser-Based Virtual Worlds in Teaching Grammar. Teaching English with Technology, 14(2), 52-67. http://www.tewtjournal.org

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of Table 1 standard deviations across the four test occasions for both groups. The article states the treatment "did little to level out the differences" between subjects, although no treatment increased them further.

"standard deviations in both groups were higher on the posttests than on the pretest. However, the control group stood out against the treatment group , whose standard deviation was the highest on delayed posttest 2"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.