Claims

Kindergarten treatment status was negatively related to third-grade expository writing quality

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Treatment status in the kindergarten reading intervention was negatively related to expository writing quality (β = −.23, p = .009) after accounting for other predictors. → Kim Young-Suk 2015

Evidence

Kim Young-Suk 2015

Kim Young-Suk, Al Otaiba Stephanie, Wanzek Jeanne. (2015). Kindergarten Predictors of Third Grade Writing. Learning and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.009

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Secondary finding from the expository SEM in the longitudinal subsample (N = 157) of a larger cluster randomized reading intervention study. The quote reports the negative treatment path; no effect size beyond β was printed.

"An exception was treatment status such that it was negatively related to expository writing quality after accounting for the other predictors in the models (β = −.23, p = .009)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id treatment-status-negatively-related-expository-quality
title Kindergarten treatment status was negatively related to third-grade expository writing quality
description Kindergarten treatment status was negatively related to third-grade expository writing quality
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kim-young-suk-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.