Treatment teachers reported providing more incidental exposure to target vocabulary than control teachers (ES = .54)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 In OLS regression of teacher survey data, treatment teachers self-reported a half standard deviation more incidental exposure to target vocabulary than control teachers (β1 = 0.54, p < .01; ES = .54). → Mosher 2024
Evidence¶
Mosher 2024¶
Mosher, D. M., Burkhauser, M. A., & Kim, J. S. (2024). Improving second-grade reading comprehension through a sustained content literacy intervention: A mixed-methods study examining the mediating role of domain-specific vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(4), 550–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000868
q2 · i1 · causal · r2
OLS regression of survey responses from the teacher subsample (N = 48 interviewed; survey completed by all 48), controlling for self-reported explicit teaching of target words and gender. The article reports "treatment teachers reporting a half standard deviation of greater exposure" (β1 = 0.54); the abstract labels this Effect Size [ES] = .54, a small effect. Survey results served as a fidelity proxy because COVID-19 closures prevented observations.
"Results (Table 6) indicated significant differences of self-reported incidental exposure between treatment and control conditions, with treatment teachers reporting a half standard deviation of greater exposure (𝛽𝛽1 = 0.54, 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 0.20, 𝑝𝑝 < .01)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers with high incidental exposure described expanded opportunities for word use and connecting words to topics — related
- L2 learners pick up vocabulary incidentally from meaning-focused input, with reading the most-studied mode and listening yielding similar proportions of words learned — related
- Grade 1 and Grade 2 domain-specific vocabulary knowledge explained 69% of the MORE intervention's treatment effect on Grade 2 domain-specific reading comprehension — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
treatment-teachers-more-incidental-exposure |
title |
Treatment teachers reported providing more incidental exposure to target vocabulary than control teachers (ES = .54) |
description |
Treatment teachers reported providing more incidental exposure to target vocabulary than control teachers (ES = .54) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mosher-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.