Claims

The Triple-Focus reading intervention outperformed business-as-usual controls at posttest on all 14 reading and reading-related outcomes, with average Cohen's d of .80 on standardized and 1.69 on experimental measures

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Intervention children outperformed control children at posttest on all 14 outcomes, with average effect sizes of .80 (standardized) and 1.69 (experimental measures). → Lovett 2017

Evidence

Lovett 2017

Lovett, Frijters, Wolf, Steinbach, Sevcik, & Morris. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000181

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental multi-site study comparing 172 Triple-Focus children with 47 controls; the reported contrast shows intervention children "out-performed control children at posttest on all 14 outcomes" with d = .80 on standardized and 1.69 on experimental measures.

"Intervention children out-performed control children at posttest on all 14 outcomes, with average effect sizes (Cohen’s d) on standardized measures of .80 and on experimental measures of 1.69."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id triple-focus-outperformed-control-all-14-outcomes
title The Triple-Focus reading intervention outperformed business-as-usual controls at posttest on all 14 reading and reading-related outcomes, with average Cohen's d of .80 on standardized and 1.69 on experimental measures
description The Triple-Focus reading intervention outperformed business-as-usual controls at posttest on all 14 reading and reading-related outcomes, with average Cohen's d of .80 on standardized and 1.69 on experimental measures
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lovett-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.