Trust evaluations were strongly and positively correlated across all robot–task combinations, suggesting trust in social robots may be a stable, generalized attitude¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Mean trust scores across all nine robot–task combinations showed strong positive intercorrelations (r = .56–.89, p < .001). → Anna-Maria Velentza 2026
Evidence¶
Anna-Maria Velentza 2026¶
Anna-Maria Velentza, Konstantina Nikou, Anne-Gwenn Bosser, Nikolaos Fachantidis. (2026). What Robots Do Matters More Than What They Look Like: Task Context Shapes Trust in Educational HRI. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22What+Robots+Do+Matters+More+Than+What+They+Look+Like%22 doi:10.1109/ro-man72286.2026.11714558
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Pearson correlation analysis of mean trust scores across all robot–task combinations in the N = 81 experiment. The article reports "r = .56–.89 and p < .001", and interprets that participants accepting a robot in one context tended to accept the same and other robots across contexts.
"A correlation matrix of mean trust scores (Fig. 5) revealed strong positive associations across all robot–task combinations, with r = .56–.89 and p < .001."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Task type strongly determines trust in educational robots, with highest trust for procedural instruction, moderate trust for teaching, and lowest trust when robots request personal information — reports the opposite
- The interaction between robot appearance and task on trust was only marginal, suggesting appearance may slightly modulate expectations without determining trust — related
- The three technology-integrated TPACK domains intercorrelate so strongly (r = .81–.91) that they may function as a single factor in this faculty population — related
- Robot appearance showed no meaningful effect on trust: pairwise robot differences did not reach significance after Bonferroni adjustment — related
- Hypotheses that specific robot appearances would be trusted more in matching tasks (humanoids for teaching, task-oriented robots for instructions, soft robots for personal disclosure) were not confirmed — related
- A conceptual framework paper reports, citing a meta-analysis (Roesler et al., 2021), that anthropomorphism benefits human-robot interaction with effects varying across task contexts and design implementations — related
- Different humanlike design dimensions cue distinct classes of anthropomorphism inferences — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
trust-stable-generalized-attitude-robots |
title |
Trust evaluations were strongly and positively correlated across all robot–task combinations, suggesting trust in social robots may be a stable, generalized attitude |
description |
Trust evaluations were strongly and positively correlated across all robot–task combinations, suggesting trust in social robots may be a stable, generalized attitude |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — anna-maria-velentza-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.