Post hoc comparisons showed the experimental group outperformed the traditional group, and the control group outperformed the traditional group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Tukey tests indicated a significant difference between Groups A and B in favor of A, and between Groups B and C in favor of C. → Gheith and Aljaberi 2017

Evidence¶

Gheith and Aljaberi 2017¶

Eman Gheith & Nahil M. Aljaberi. (2017). The Effectiveness of an Interactive Training Program in Developing a Set of Non-Cognitive Skills in Students at University of Petra. International Education Studies, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p60

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Post hoc Tukey comparisons following the three-group ANOVA on the non-cognitive skills scale. Notably, the traditional lecture group scored significantly below both the interactive group and the untreated control group; no effect sizes are printed.

"The results indicated a statistically significance difference between methods used in Group A and B, in favor of Group A; in addition to a statistically significant difference between methods used in Group B and Group C (the control group), in favor of Group C."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• An interactive training program produced statistically significant differences among three teaching methods on overall non-cognitive skills and on empathy, growth mindset and grit; post hoc tests found it beat traditional teaching, and the article does not report its comparison with a no-training control — a broader claim this one bears on
• Both the movie-adaptation and news-adaptation groups significantly outperformed the control group on listening posttest, and did not differ from each other — related