Claims

Turkish pre-service teachers of English showed low baseline competency, with approximately 80% failing to recognize the pitch patterns of If-clauses on the pre-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the written pre-test, approximately 80% of the 61 participants failed to recognize the pitch patterns of If-clauses, indicating a need for remedial training. → Topal 2018

Evidence

Topal 2018

Topal, İ.H. (2018). An investigation into the recognition and production of pitch patterns of if-clauses by turkish pre-service teachers of english. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 285-300. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1201884

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of the written and oral pre-tests of 61 Turkish freshman ELT participants. The author reports that "Approximately 80% of the participants failed to recognize the pitch patterns of If-clauses in general" and about half failed at production, leading to the remedial session.

"Approximately 80% of the participants failed to recognize the pitch patterns of If-clauses in general. Regarding the production of the pitch patterns of If-clauses, approximately half of the participants failed to produce the correct pitch patterns of If-clauses"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.