Claims

Exposure to TV-series video clips did not produce a statistically significant advantage in immediate learning of formulaic sequences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's posttest learning rate was higher than the control group's but the difference was not statistically significant; no effect size was printed for this comparison. → Koç and Koç 2017

Evidence

Koç and Koç 2017

Didem Koban Koç & Serdar Engin Koç. (2017). On the Role of Media Input in the Learning of Formulaic Sequences by EFL Learners. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 34(3), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1275

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t-test on the posttest of 20 experimental and 20 control participants after the 3-week treatment. The article reports the experimental group's higher means but states "this difference was not significant"; equivalence was not tested.

"Table 1 shows that the learning rate for the experimental group (M = 13.75, SD = 4.55) was higher than that of the control group (M = 11.80, SD = 5.99). However, this difference was not significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.