Claims

Feeble-minded intellectual development takes two forms: near-normal development to a limit followed by abrupt cessation, or constant slight retardation with increasing backwardness

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r? · q1
Currency · newest study 1912 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 1917: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Some feeble-minded children develop nearly normally up to a point and then suddenly cease to increase in mental ability, while others develop under a constant but slight retardation at each year. → E. A. Doll 1912

Evidence

E. A. Doll 1912

E. A. Doll. (1912). Inexpert Binet Examiners and Their Limitations. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://www.jstor.org

q1 · i? · theoretical · r?

The author's interpretation of existing knowledge about feeble-minded development, hedged as what it "tends to show": one type tests normal until reaching a developmental limit and then abruptly stops progressing, the other shows constantly increasing backwardness. No data are reported.

"even the little that we already know about the intellectual development of the feeble-minded tends to show that some do develop nearly normally up to a certain point and then suddenly cease to increase in mental ability, and that others develop under a constant, but slight, retardation at each year."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.