Findings from two states and three cities cannot be generalized to a national estimate of program effects¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The report explicitly limits the generalizability of its findings to a national estimate. → Brian Gill 2009

Evidence¶

Brian Gill 2009¶

Brian Gill, J.R. Lockwood III, Francisco Martorell, Claude Messan Setodji, Kevin Booker. (2009). An Exploratory Analysis of Adequate Yearly Progress, Identification for Improvement, and Student Achievement in Two States and Three Cities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/an-exploratory-analysis-of-adequate-yearly-progress-identification-for-improvement-and-student-achievement-in-two-states-and-three-cities

q3 · i? · causal · r?

The report states as a scope limitation that "Findings from two states and three cities cannot be generalized to produce a national estimate of program effects on student achievement."

"Findings from two states and three cities cannot be generalized to produce a national estimate of program effects on student achievement."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The report explicitly discusses limitations of the Oklahoma value-added model — related
• The case study cannot distinguish which program elements caused the positive impacts — related
• None of the WWC-standards-meeting studies of Tier 2 literacy interventions were conducted in CNMI or other Pacific islands, limiting generalizability — a broader claim this one bears on