Typical gestures are rated as more semantically related to accompanying speech than atypical gestures¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? In the second study, typical gestures were rated as more semantically related to the speech than were atypical gestures. → Dargue 2020

Evidence¶

Dargue 2020¶

Dargue, N; Sweller, N. (2020). Learning Stories Through Gesture: Gesture's Effects on Child and Adult Narrative Comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 32 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09505-0

q3 · i? · causal · r?

The abstract reports the second study's rating result: participants rated typical gestures as more semantically related to the accompanying speech than atypical gestures. No rating statistics or effect sizes are printed in the available text.

"In a second study, typical gestures were rated as more semantically related to the speech than were atypical gestures."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Observing typical gestures significantly benefits narrative comprehension compared with atypical or no gestures, which do not differ significantly — related
• Redundant speech-gesture cooperation improves recall and social perception more than complementarity — related
• Culturally familiar emblematic gestures improve L2 speech perception and social evaluations, whereas unfamiliar emblems reduce them — related
• Observing typical gestures, but not atypical gestures, significantly benefits adult narrative comprehension — related