In UCI/SEDET's first year under the method (2025), average processing time fell 50%, cases processed rose 31%, documents 67%, technical reports 85%, and dispatches 60%¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? UCI/SEDET's 2024-to-2025 comparison shows average processing time falling from 34 to 17 days (−50%), cases processed rising from 256 to 336 (+31%), documents from 251 to 419 (+67%), technical reports from 66 to 122 (+85%), and dispatches from 102 to 163 (+60%). → Vinicius Santana Gomes 2026
Evidence¶
Vinicius Santana Gomes 2026¶
Vinicius Santana Gomes. (2026). The Main Barrier to AI Adoption in the Public Sector Is Lack of Training: How a Structured Method Accompanied Productivity Gains in Two Brazilian Government Cases. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01517 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.01517
q2 · i? · design · r2
Observational before-and-after comparison of official SEI-GDF statistics consolidated in Report No. 1/2026 of SEDET/GAB/UCI, comparing 2025 (first year under the method) with 2024. The article reports "simultaneous gains across all aggregate indicators", including dispatches rising from 102 to 163 (+60%).
"Average processing time fell from 34 days to 17 days (−50%). Processing capacity rose from 256 to 336 cases processed (+31%). Total documentary output grew from 251 to 419 documents (+67%). The output of the densest piece, the technical report, rose from 66 to 122 (+85%)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In the first year under the structured AI training method, SES/CONT's average case processing time fell 18.2% (17.92 to 14.66 days) while documentary output per case stayed stable — related
- UCI/SEDET's 122 technical reports in 2025 yielded 286 formal recommendations and concerned cases and matters totaling US$ 94.8 million, with an August peak of US$ 19.1 million absorbed without bottlenecks — related
- SES/CONT's time gains translated into an estimated released capacity of about 352 additional cases (+22.3%) and cleared backlog, and output shifted toward preventive work (Advisory Notices +664%) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
uci-sedet-simultaneous-gains-2025 |
title |
In UCI/SEDET's first year under the method (2025), average processing time fell 50%, cases processed rose 31%, documents 67%, technical reports 85%, and dispatches 60% |
description |
In UCI/SEDET's first year under the method (2025), average processing time fell 50%, cases processed rose 31%, documents 67%, technical reports 85%, and dispatches 60% |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — vinicius-santana-gomes-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.