Undergraduate students were the most studied academic level in AIEd higher education research, at 72% of studies¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 99 of 138 studies (72%) focused on undergraduate students, compared with 12 of 138 (9%) for graduate students. → Crompton 2023

Evidence¶

Crompton 2023¶

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

A priori coding of academic level across the 138 studies. The review reports "99 of the 138 (72%) focused on these students" versus 12 of 138 (9%) for graduate students, and suggests convenience sampling and predictive-analytics affordances as possible reasons.

"the majority of studies involved under - graduate students with 99 of the 138 (72%) focused on these students. This was in com - parison to the 12 of 138 (9%) for graduate students."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• 72% of AIEd higher education studies focused on students as the intended users, 17% on instructors, and 11% on managers — related
• ChatGPT-supported STEAM IBL research is split evenly between K-12 and higher education, but undergraduates dominate and no study examined elementary learners — related
• Language learning was the most common subject domain for AIEd in higher education, at 17% — related