Claims

Engagement modes were unevenly distributed across units, with some units rated Interactive and others entirely Passive

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The audit found an uneven distribution of ICAP modes across the eight units, with some units Interactive and some entirely Passive. → Pollard 2025

Evidence

Pollard 2025

Pollard, V., Armatas, C., & Pepe, A. (2025). Feedback is integral: Using a revised ICAP Framework to achieve active learning in an asynchronous online course. Online Learning, 29(3), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i3.4555

q2 · i? · design · r2

Course-level audit of eight asynchronous online units. The authors report that "an uneven distribution of modes was found" across units, attributing this partly to the design template and partly to development time pressures.

"Additionally, an uneven distribution of modes was found, with some units rated as Interactive and some entirely Passive."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id uneven-icap-mode-distribution-across-units
title Engagement modes were unevenly distributed across units, with some units rated Interactive and others entirely Passive
description Engagement modes were unevenly distributed across units, with some units rated Interactive and others entirely Passive
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — pollard-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.