When guidance was presented in a unitary (integrated) format, worked examples were superior to conventional problems (Experiments 4 and 5)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 1991 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? With guidance presented in a unitary format, students learning from worked examples outperformed students solving conventional problems. → Ahmad Tarmizi 1991
Evidence¶
Ahmad Tarmizi 1991¶
Ahmad Tarmizi, Rohani. (1991). Guidance During Mathematical Problem Solving. Doctoral thesis, University of New South Wales. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/69310
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Experiments 4 and 5 with school students learning circle geometry, reported in the thesis abstract. Presenting text and diagram in a unitary format "did not split attention", and the thesis reports a superiority of worked examples over conventional problems under this format. No effect size is printed.
"It was further found that presenting information (e.g. text and diagram) in a unitary format did not split attention and interfere with learning by misdirecting attention and imposing a heavy cognitive load."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- For circle geometry problems, guidance in the form of subgoals or worked examples increased cognitive load during problem processing (Experiments 1-3) — related
- Under many circumstances, studying worked examples produced superior learning compared to active problem solving, as suggested by previous research — a broader claim this one bears on
- Split-attention worked examples lose their advantage over conventional practice, while integrated formats restore it — related
- Variability of practice interacts with problem format: high variability aids learning from worked examples but harms learning from conventional problems — related
- The worked example effect failed to replicate for geometry and kinematics problems, and was reinstated when worked examples were restructured to reduce split attention — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
unitary-format-worked-examples-superior-conventional-problems |
title |
When guidance was presented in a unitary (integrated) format, worked examples were superior to conventional problems (Experiments 4 and 5) |
description |
When guidance was presented in a unitary (integrated) format, worked examples were superior to conventional problems (Experiments 4 and 5) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1991 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ahmad-tarmizi-1991 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.