Claims

Watching BBC World clips without English subtitles also improved intermediate EFL learners' vocabulary development relative to no treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The no-subtitle experimental group's posttest mean (34.9) exceeded the control group's (30.0), leading the authors to reject the null hypothesis for Q2. → Sirmandi and Sardareh 2016

Evidence

Sirmandi and Sardareh 2016

Effat Heidari Sirmandi, Sedigheh Abbasnasab Sardareh. (2016). The Effect of BBC World Clips With and Without Subtitles on Intermediate EFL Learners' Vocabulary Development. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1116325

q2 · i? · causal · r2

In the same three-group experiment, the unsubtitled group improved from a pretest mean of 18.5 to a posttest mean of 34.9 while the control reached 30.0; the article reports the no-subtitle hypothesis "Is rejected". No effect size is printed.

"Regarding the presented information on pre and posttest of the unsubtitled group in Table 1 and 2, it revealed that the second research hypothesis "Watching BBC World clips without English subtitles have no significant impact on Intermediate Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary development." Is rejected."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.