Claims

URM students left biomedical fields at higher rates than majority students, an effect explained in part by their lower biology course grades

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 URM students were more likely to leave biomedical fields (OR = 1.25), and the indirect effect of URM status on attrition through biology course grades was significant. → Rosenzweig 2021 q3 i? URM students received significantly lower grades in the biology course than majority students, but did not report significantly lower end-of-semester interest. → Rosenzweig 2021 (2)

Evidence

Rosenzweig 2021

Rosenzweig, E. Q., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hecht, C. A., Priniski, S. J., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Asher, M. W., & Hyde, J. S. (2021). College Students’ Reasons for Leaving Biomedical Fields: Disenchantment with Biomedicine or Attraction to Other Fields? Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000456

q3 · i1 · associational · r2

Demographic-only logistic regression predicting attrition in the 1193-student sample. The article reports "OR = 1.25" with 22.5% of URM students leaving versus 15.0% of majority students.

"URM students were more likely to leave biomedical fields, b = 0.22, z = 2.16, p = .03, OR = 1.25; 22.5% of URM students left biomedical fields as compared to 15.0% of majority students."

Rosenzweig 2021 (2)

Rosenzweig, E. Q., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hecht, C. A., Priniski, S. J., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Asher, M. W., & Hyde, J. S. (2021). College Students’ Reasons for Leaving Biomedical Fields: Disenchantment with Biomedicine or Attraction to Other Fields? Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000456

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Regression analyses testing group differences on the psychological variables. URM students' lower grades (β = −0.18, p < .001) but not lower interest (β = −0.02, p = .495) supported the grades pathway.

"Results suggested that URM students did not report significantly lower interest in Biology, β = −0.02, p = .495, but they did receive significantly lower grades, β = −0.18, p < .001 (see Table 8)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id urm-higher-biomedical-attrition-mediated-by-grades
title URM students left biomedical fields at higher rates than majority students, an effect explained in part by their lower biology course grades
description URM students left biomedical fields at higher rates than majority students, an effect explained in part by their lower biology course grades
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — rosenzweig-2021, rosenzweig-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.