URM students left biomedical fields at higher rates than majority students, an effect explained in part by their lower biology course grades¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 URM students were more likely to leave biomedical fields (OR = 1.25), and the indirect effect of URM status on attrition through biology course grades was significant. → Rosenzweig 2021
q3 i? URM students received significantly lower grades in the biology course than majority students, but did not report significantly lower end-of-semester interest. → Rosenzweig 2021 (2)
Evidence¶
Rosenzweig 2021¶
Rosenzweig, E. Q., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hecht, C. A., Priniski, S. J., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Asher, M. W., & Hyde, J. S. (2021). College Students’ Reasons for Leaving Biomedical Fields: Disenchantment with Biomedicine or Attraction to Other Fields? Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000456
q3 · i1 · associational · r2
Demographic-only logistic regression predicting attrition in the 1193-student sample. The article reports "OR = 1.25" with 22.5% of URM students leaving versus 15.0% of majority students.
"URM students were more likely to leave biomedical fields, b = 0.22, z = 2.16, p = .03, OR = 1.25; 22.5% of URM students left biomedical fields as compared to 15.0% of majority students."
Rosenzweig 2021 (2)¶
Rosenzweig, E. Q., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hecht, C. A., Priniski, S. J., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Asher, M. W., & Hyde, J. S. (2021). College Students’ Reasons for Leaving Biomedical Fields: Disenchantment with Biomedicine or Attraction to Other Fields? Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000456
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Regression analyses testing group differences on the psychological variables. URM students' lower grades (β = −0.18, p < .001) but not lower interest (β = −0.02, p = .495) supported the grades pathway.
"Results suggested that URM students did not report significantly lower interest in Biology, β = −0.02, p = .495, but they did receive significantly lower grades, β = −0.18, p < .001 (see Table 8)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- End-of-course interest in biology and introductory biology grades each predicted lower likelihood of leaving biomedical fields — related
- Leavers reported lower end-of-semester interest, lower prior achievement, and lower biology grades than stayers, with no differences in FG status, gender, or baseline interest — related
- URM students were more likely than non-URM leavers to report leaving due to disenchantment rather than attraction — related
- Among biomedical leavers, 62.5% described leaving only in terms of disenchantment while 25.2% described only attraction and 12.2% both equally — related
- Interest and value were the dominant topics in leavers' explanations, especially among students leaving due to attraction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
urm-higher-biomedical-attrition-mediated-by-grades |
title |
URM students left biomedical fields at higher rates than majority students, an effect explained in part by their lower biology course grades |
description |
URM students left biomedical fields at higher rates than majority students, an effect explained in part by their lower biology course grades |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — rosenzweig-2021, rosenzweig-2021-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.