Simulation interventions showed positive usability and feasibility, with technical preparation needs sometimes causing non-completion¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Blok et al. (2023) reported a System Usability Survey total score of 77.5, where 68 or above is considered above average, and technical problems were flagged as reasons for participants' non-completion in two studies. → Terry Julia 2025

Evidence¶

Terry Julia 2025¶

Terry Julia, Wilks Rachel, Davies Joanne. (2025). Simulated learning interventions to improve communication and practice with deaf and hard of hearing patients: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Advances in Health Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10452-5

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review synthesis of practical usability and feasibility outcomes in the Results section. Blok et al.'s 360-video intervention scored 77.5 on the System Usability Survey in a classroom setting with 22 nurse practitioner students; the review also notes technical preparation needs and that technical difficulties contributed to non-completion in Blok et al. and Sanders et al.

"Blok et al. (2023) tested the intervention for system usability with a survey with participants reporting an average of 77.5 for system usability, (where 68 or higher was considered above average)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Two included studies were Deaf-led or user-centred, developing simulation content from data gathered with Deaf communities from the start — related
• Older adults rated the KOKU digital programme with excellent usability and high acceptability — related
• After design adjustments, the LAD achieved good–excellent usability (SUS M = 4.13, equal to 78.25%) — related