Implementing USG-PVC education reduces the need for subsequent central venous catheters or PICCs¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Several studies after implementation of ultrasound-guidance education reported a decrease in the need for PICC or CVC. → Jørgensen Rasmus 2021
Evidence¶
Jørgensen Rasmus 2021¶
Jørgensen Rasmus, Laursen Christian B., Konge Lars, Pietersen Pia Iben. (2021). Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00897-z
q2 · i? · review · r3
Review synthesis of implementation studies at the clinical-impact level; the review reports that "A decrease in the need for PICC or CVC was seen in several studies" following education implementation. No effect sizes are printed.
"A decrease in the need for PICC or CVC was seen in several studies after the implementation of education in ultrasound guidance for PVC placement [21, 29, 62, 66, 67]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.