Feedback content matters: feedback on the procedural skill was superior to feedback on results, and light/buzzer feedback outperformed voice or no feedback¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Farjad Sultan et al. found feedback on the procedural skill was superior to feedback on results for skill acquisition. → Sekhavati P 2025
q2 i? Lerman et al. found LED light and piezoelectric buzzer feedback were superior to voice feedback and no feedback for visualising and reaching the simulated target nerve. → Sekhavati P 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Sekhavati P 2025¶
Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports, citing Farjad Sultan et al., that "providing feedback on the procedural skill" was "superior to feedback on the results" for skill acquisition.
"Farjad Sultan et al. found that for skill acquisition, providing feedback on the procedural skill (involving identification and correction of errors and advice on how to avoid them) was superior to feedback on the results (involving imaging, needling, performance time and number of needle passes) [57]."
Sekhavati P 2025 (2)¶
Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports, citing Lerman et al., that "LED light and piezoelectric buzzer feedback were superior to voice feedback and no feedback in visualising and reaching the simulated target nerve".
"Lerman et al. found that LED light and piezoelectric buzzer feedback were superior to voice feedback and no feedback in visualising and reaching the simulated target nerve [37]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Human mentor feedback was often judged superior to automated simulator feedback for guiding skill acquisition — related
- IONM-based education lowered recurrent laryngeal nerve injury rates and enhanced procedural standardization — related
- VR tools enhance acquisition and retention of clinical and procedural skills but face barriers including cybersickness, limited tactile feedback and variable long-term skill transfer — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.