Claims

Feedback content matters: feedback on the procedural skill was superior to feedback on results, and light/buzzer feedback outperformed voice or no feedback

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Farjad Sultan et al. found feedback on the procedural skill was superior to feedback on results for skill acquisition. → Sekhavati P 2025 q2 i? Lerman et al. found LED light and piezoelectric buzzer feedback were superior to voice feedback and no feedback for visualising and reaching the simulated target nerve. → Sekhavati P 2025 (2)

Evidence

Sekhavati P 2025

Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports, citing Farjad Sultan et al., that "providing feedback on the procedural skill" was "superior to feedback on the results" for skill acquisition.

"Farjad Sultan et al. found that for skill acquisition, providing feedback on the procedural skill (involving identification and correction of errors and advice on how to avoid them) was superior to feedback on the results (involving imaging, needling, performance time and number of needle passes) [57]."

Sekhavati P 2025 (2)

Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports, citing Lerman et al., that "LED light and piezoelectric buzzer feedback were superior to voice feedback and no feedback in visualising and reaching the simulated target nerve".

"Lerman et al. found that LED light and piezoelectric buzzer feedback were superior to voice feedback and no feedback in visualising and reaching the simulated target nerve [37]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.