Claims

Giving students a choice between self-focused and other-focused utility-value assignments produced higher course grades than fixing the assignment type

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students given a choice between UV assignment types earned higher grades than students in fixed-type conditions (β = 0.06, p = .040). → Priniski 2019

Evidence

Priniski 2019

Priniski, S. J., Rosenzweig, E. Q., Canning, E. A., Hecht, C. A., Tibbetts, Y., Hyde, J. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2019). The Benefits of Combining Value for the Self and Others in Utility-Value Interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000343

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the same RCT's performance analyses, the choice contrast compared the choice condition with the four fixed-type conditions. The quoted sentence reports the significant effect, "β = 0.06, p = .040", and the printed means for both sides of the comparison.

"There was also a main effect of the choice contrast on course performance, β = 0.06, p = .040, such that students who were given a choice between UV assignment types earned higher grades in the course (M = 3.06, SD = 0.59) than students in the four conditions in which UV assignment types were fixed (M = 2.95, SD = 0.75)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id uv-choice-structure-higher-grades
title Giving students a choice between self-focused and other-focused utility-value assignments produced higher course grades than fixing the assignment type
description Giving students a choice between self-focused and other-focused utility-value assignments produced higher course grades than fixing the assignment type
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — priniski-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.