Claims

UVIs are more effective when students generate their own examples of utility, invest more engagement, and are given choices

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The intervention is most effective when students generate examples of utility for themselves rather than being provided with reasons why course topics might be useful. → Carol Sansone 2026 q2 i? Students' engagement when discussing utility value, reflected in the number of words in their essays, consistently serves as a mediator of the UVI's effects on course outcomes, and effects are stronger when students are given choices. → Carol Sansone 2026 (2)

Evidence

Carol Sansone 2026

Carol Sansone, K. Ann Renninger, Judith M. Harackiewicz. (2026). Motivating Self-Regulation: Utility Value, Interest Development, and the Potential for Intervention. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10142-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative review attributing to Canning and Harackiewicz (2015) the finding that self-generated utility examples make the intervention more effective than provided reasons; the review frames generating personal examples as a form of self-regulation.

"research has found that the intervention is most effective when students generate examples of utility for themselves rather than being provided with reasons why course topics might useful (Canning & Harackiewicz, 2015)"

Carol Sansone 2026 (2)

Carol Sansone, K. Ann Renninger, Judith M. Harackiewicz. (2026). Motivating Self-Regulation: Utility Value, Interest Development, and the Potential for Intervention. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10142-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative review reporting that essay word count consistently mediates UVI effects on course outcomes, and that effects are stronger when students choose topics to write about or methods of generating utility (Asher & Harackiewicz, 2025; Priniski et al., 2019; Rosenzweig et al., 2019).

"the degree of students' engagement when discussing utility value for course content (as reflected in the number of words in their essays) consistently serves as a mediator of the effects of the UVI on course outcomes (Asher et al., 2023; Harackiewicz et al., 2016)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id uvi-generated-examples-choice-moderators
title UVIs are more effective when students generate their own examples of utility, invest more engagement, and are given choices
description UVIs are more effective when students generate their own examples of utility, invest more engagement, and are given choices
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — carol-sansone-2026, carol-sansone-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.