Perceived value of creativity informs judgments and expectancies primarily indirectly through task-specific variables, especially task interest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The perceived value of creativity informed both metacognitive judgments and expectancy before Task 2 primarily through indirect effects, unlike creative self-efficacy. → Kamila Urban 2025
Evidence¶
Kamila Urban 2025¶
Kamila Urban, Marek Urban. (2025). Metacognition and motivation in creativity: examining the roles of self-efficacy and values as cues for metacognitive judgments. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09421-5
q2 · i? · associational · r2
In the two-wave SEM of the 360-student sample, "the indirect effects were stronger than those of creative self-efficacy" for value of creativity, with mediation classified as partial (74% and 77%) for judgment and expectancy pathways.
"For the perceived value of creativity, the indirect effects were stronger than those of creative self-efficacy, with β = 0.30, p <.001 for expectancy before Task 2, and β = 0.23, p <.001 and β = 0.27, p <.001 for metacognitive judgments."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Interest — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Motivation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Perceived difficulty and task interest in Task 1 indirectly inform expectancy beliefs for Task 2 — related
- Creative performance weakly predicts metacognitive judgments, with perceived difficulty and task interest serving as additional cues — related
- Task interest remains stable across consecutive creativity tasks: interest in one task is strongly and directly associated with interest in the next, with little mediation by task experience — related
- Learners invest more effort in tasks they perceive as interesting, personally important, or useful to their future goals. — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
value-of-creativity-indirect-through-interest |
title |
Perceived value of creativity informs judgments and expectancies primarily indirectly through task-specific variables, especially task interest |
description |
Perceived value of creativity informs judgments and expectancies primarily indirectly through task-specific variables, especially task interest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-19 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kamila-urban-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.