Claims

About 9% of variance in classroom ICT use lies between schools, with the remainder between teachers within schools

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2013: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 9.16% of total variance in teachers' classroom ICT use is attributable to differences between schools and 90.83% to differences between teachers within schools. → Tondeur 2008

Evidence

Tondeur 2008

Tondeur, J., van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51, 212-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.003

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Two-level unconditional null model from the multilevel analysis of 574 teachers in 53 schools; both variance components were significantly different from zero (school-level p = 0.013; teacher-level p < 0.000), justifying the multilevel approach.

"Respectively 9.16% of the total variance in teachers’ use of ICT in the classroom is related to differences between schools, while the remaining part of 90.83% of the variance can be attributed to differences between teachers within schools."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.