Student satisfaction with VDTs ranged from 64 to 95%, with preference for VDT-exclusive learning low (2.4–30.2%)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Student satisfaction with VDTs ranged from 64 to 95%, but preference for VDT-exclusive learning was reported by only 2.4–30.2% of students. → Telecan Teodora 2025

Evidence¶

Telecan Teodora 2025¶

Telecan Teodora, Capraș Roxana-Denisa, Filip Gabriela Adriana, Bonea Maria, Crivii Carmen-Bianca. (2025). Dissection in the 21st century: virtual tables versus traditional methods and their influence on medical students' perception – a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07946-6

q2 · i? · review · r2

Review synthesis of perception studies (18 studies assessing user satisfaction). Reports that "Student satisfaction ranged from 64 to 95%" while "preference for VDT-exclusive learning remained low, reported by only 2.4–30.2% of students".

"Student satisfaction ranged from 64 to 95%, with the majority citing improved spatial understanding, engagement, And repeatability. However, preference for VDT-exclusive learning remained low, reported by only 2.4–30.2% of students."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Perceived VDT utility did not always correspond to measurable academic advantage — related
• Students overwhelmingly favored a hybrid approach combining VDTs with cadaveric dissection over full replacement — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• VDT use was associated with reduced cadaveric dissection-related anxiety, including lower pre-exam STAI scores — related